“And, if its purpose was as anodyne as Pence now makes it out to be, and if Pence is as blindsided by the backlash as he’s now pretending to be, then why did he sign it in a secret ceremony in which he was surrounded by some of the state’s most serious professional homophobes?”
Republican Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard, likely worried about those attending Final Four events next weekend and the fallout to his city, has “called on the state to add sexual orientation to its civil rights law.” Ballard has also “banned discrimination by Christian businesses receiving city funds.” According to the Indianapolis Star, Ballard stated:
“Our city thrives because we have welcomed and embraced diversity. And RFRA threatens what thousands have spent decades building,” Ballard said on Monday. “Discrimination is wrong. And I hope that message is being heard loud and clear at our Statehouse.”
This was on the front page of the Indianapolis Star yesterday, Indiana’s largest newspaper:
Even FOX News anchor Bret Baier debunked Governor Pence’s claim that the RFRA simply echoed legislation that had been passed in 1993, or that it was similar to that on the books in 19 other states. An excerpt of the Bret Baier’s remarks from the FOX News transcript follows:
BAIER: “…In specific terms, Indiana’s law deals with a person who can claim religious persecution but that includes corporations, for profit entities and it could also be used as a defense in a civil suit that does not involve the government. That is broader than the other laws. This is where it’s a little different in Indiana’s case. You saw governor Mike Pence try to defend the law and say it’s just like the 1993 federal law where it’s just like 19 other states, but as you look in the fine print, it’s not really, and it may be something that Indiana deals with in specifics to line up with the others.”
Pence has damaged the reputation of his own state and for what? As of Monday, he cancelled a number of public appearances, seeming to be in hiding. By Tuesday, Pence went on FOX News and vowed to “clarify” the law, saying it is “not a license to discriminate.” But if you listen to his remarks here, they travel in circles and offer nothing he hasn’t already said.
Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson was about to sign similar legislation last night, but upon observing the reaction to Pence’s law, has asked state legislators to go back the drawing board and bring the bill they crafted into line with the 1993 federal law. Smart decision. Arkansas passing their own RFRA wouldn’t have made the one in Indiana any more popular. It would have meant CEO’s, other state leaders and grassroots activists had two states to boycott.
Why did Governor Pence think this would pass under the radar in the first place? Reportedly, Pence has aspirations beyond the Governor’s mansion and must have thought that this move was going to burnish his Conservative bona fides. But all of this points to the dilemma facing Republican candidates going into the 2016 presidential race.
By doubling down in order to maintain their religious base, Republicans are at risk of losing everyone else. There are many fiscal conservatives in our nation who, even if they are not social progressives, have a more tolerant, “live and let live” attitude toward those with whom they may not agree. The trend of tolerance toward gay marriage is on the upswing and laws like the RFRA are out of touch with much of the nation.
Similarly, the first bills proposed by this new Congress were about restricting a woman’s right to choose. It is almost as though those currently in charge of the Republican Party see the world changing around them and are screaming out for a time machine.
There is a reason Republicans have only won the popular vote once in the last six election cycles. A number of potential 2016 Republican candidates are staying mute on the RFRA. Perhaps they too have read the writing on the wall. Rand Paul, for example has been lauding his outreach to Millennials. They will represent 30% of the voting populace in 2016. They may not be knee-jerk liberals, but does Governor Pence or his colleagues think the youth of today, who grew up with friends who are openly gay are suddenly going to reject those they have befriended and like, or love, to embrace this kind of rhetoric or policy?
Republicans must also attract the votes of Independents to win and many of them are far more progressive socially than the current Republican leadership seem to believe. Merely bashing the opposition and using familiar, bellicose bromides will not do the trick at the voting booth. Neither will circuitous and vague reasoning such as we have witnessed by Governor Pence this past week. Signing this law in private also set off huge alarm bells. If Republicans are genuine about “tolerance” and outreach to “make more room in the tent,” this is wrong way to go about it.
Religious freedom is certainly something to be protected. But when one person’s “protection” comes at another’s restriction, rejection or discrimination, however covert, some soul searching is required.
Anita Finlay is the bestselling author of Dirty Words on Clean Skin — exposing media bias in a society not as evolved as advertised. #1 on Amazon’s Women in Politics books for 16 weeks.
Like Anita Finlay, Author on Facebook.
Follow @AnitaFinlay on Twitter.
Thank you for writing this article! Is is masterfully written. You summed up all the competing factors on RFRA. and highlighted just how out of touch the Republican party really is when it comes to the real values of American liberty that we all hold so dearly.
Thanks, Tenaya. While I may not agree with many of the principles of the old Republican Party, the new crop has a number of disturbing folks making statements and taking actions that are out of the mainstream. One can only hope that awareness grows enough that people show up at the voting booth and vote cooler and better heads into office.